|
Wednesday 23rd Aug, 2009
The Sunday
Times - 23 Aug 2009
MONEY MATTERS
Reading the
tea leaves from URA
An abridged version of this article was published in the Sunday Times of
23rd August 2009 titled “Vacancy rate a key statistic”.
By JOSEPH CHONG
1. Many thanks to
Lorna Tan for the invitation to contribute this article and her suggestion
to write about residential property, a subject of perpetual interest to
Singaporeans and currently a hot topic. I thought it would be of interest to
do a piece with an educational slant using an extract from the book that I
have been writing. Hence, this piece on investment analysis of URA data
releases.
2. Kudos must go to
the URA for releasing so much information on the property market every
quarter. In the 2Q2009 release, there are 16 annexes filled with a large
array of charts, ratios and other statistics. Multiply this by the
historical releases and mental indigestion soon follows. So, what should one
focus on in this buffet?
3. If one is a
residential property buyer, the key statistic should be the vacancy rate.
This ratio is the one I always look for whenever URA releases detailed
numbers every quarter. Unfortunately, in the last quarter and in almost
every quarter previously, the media does not even mention this key ratio.
Readers can find this in Annex E-1 of the URA quarterly release.
4. The vacancy rate
is the number of vacant units divided by the total number of available units
in Singapore. The vacancy rate is also expressed in the inverse way – as the
occupancy rate. This is the number of occupied units divided by the total
number of available units.


5. Why is the
vacancy rate important? There is a correlation between the occupancy rate
and prices. The accompanying charts which plots data from the URA shows this
correlation visually. From intuition, this makes sense – a fuller Hotel
Singapore would result in higher rents and thus capital values. The
occupancy rate was 94.1% in the second quarter.
6. Unfortunately,
prices tend to lead changes in the occupancy rate, by 2 to 3 quarters. That
is, the market seems to know where the vacancy rate would be going. The key
therefore is to figure out how the vacancy is likely to change. So, how does
the vacancy rate look going forward in the next 2 years? The clues are in
the URA data, HDB policy and the mechanics of supply and demand.
7. According to URA
data, an additional 8100 private homes on average has been occupied every
year since 1995, notwithstanding 3 severe economic downturns since then.
With the recovering global economy, we should at least see this number in
2010. The start of the integrated resorts in 2010 may push this number even
higher.
8. Here again the
published vacancy rate delivers another nugget as URA’s Annex E-1 shows how
it is derived. Despite numerous completions in the first half of the year,
the vacancy rate was steady as the number of homes occupied increased by
4774 in the first 6 months (2616 in the 2nd quarter and 2158 in the 1st
quarter) – this is strong real, not speculative demand for dwellings. This
happened despite Singapore’s worst recession since independence!
9. We pointed this
out in response to certain media queries when URA released its statistics
but it was not reported. Instead the focus was on fear-mongering projections
by a foreign investment bank that 100,000s of foreigners are expected to
leave Singapore. I guess as a PLS (poor local house), we are less likely to
be believed even when we talk facts from URA.
10. This strong
underlying demand is probably driven by immigrants. From data published by
the Singapore Department of Statistics, growth in the resident population
(citizens and PRs) has been driven by the growth in PRs. From 2000 to 2008,
the number of citizens grew by 0.6% annually whilst PRs grew by 5.8%. PRs
have been growing at an average of almost 22,000 per annum and they do not
live in tents. The rest of the world appears to see Singapore as good place
to live, despite our perpetual self gripes.
11. On the
supply side for private residences, there will be only 5,233 completions in
2010 according to Annex E-2 of the URA quarterly release. Here, I have used
expected completions of units under construction and ignored those that are
still being planned. It is unlikely that developments which have not broken
ground can be completed in 15 months.
12. This shortfall
will push the rental vacancy rate down. I estimate that this will fall from
the current 5.9 per cent to below 4.9 per cent. The last time this happened,
in early 2007, rents and capital values moved quite a fair bit. Moreover,
unlike in 2006, the cushion of unsold HDB flats is probably no longer
available.
13. Supply relief
will come in only in 2011 with 9339 units expected to be completed. As for
2012, it is too early to call given the possibility of early completions by
developers of recently launched projects. Hence, the next 12 months appear
to be good times for the residential property market and perhaps this is
what investors and “speculators” have concluded too.
14. There is
speculation in all markets and I personally know of so-called speculators
being burned to the tune of millions. Speculative interest will wax and wane
depending on market conditions. Speculation with a view to cornering the
market would be unlawful but speculative interest is important because it
provides liquidity. It makes it easier for buyers and sellers to transact.
This liquidity is also important as it promotes price discovery and pricing
efficient – the fair value of an asset is reached more quickly. Therefore,
curb 'speculation' with care as it may result in unintended consequences and
send the wrong message to investors that we are fickle rule changers.
15. Nevertheless, if
one feels uneasy about the re-bound in prices and is hesitant about
investing in a property, there will be other opportunities. In the
investment world, another bus will always come along. In the near term, the
US property market is an early opportunity. We may be adding this bombed-out
sector to our global ETF portfolio soon. Meanwhile, in the medium term,
China has made it to our potential to-short list, with the trigger being
inevitable monetary tightening.
16. Longer out
(distressed) Singapore office properties should offer compelling value by
2011 when the oversupply drives vacancy rates up to 16% plus. That reminds
me. Time to get back to work on that distressed properties fund that we need
to launch.
.
The writer is CEO of financial adviser New
Independent. He welcomes feedback at : josephchong@ni.com.sg
This article is for information only.
Readers should seek independent advice before making any investment decisions
|