|
Wednesday 24th Jun, 2009
Business Times -
24 Jun 2009
MONEY MATTERS
Harnessing
the ETF revolution
Exchange-traded funds now straddle virtually all asset classes and have
become a global phenomenon
By JOSEPH CHONG
GLOBAL equity
markets are roughly unchanged year to date. But this statistical calm masks
a roller-coaster ride. Stocks fell 30 per cent until the second week of
March - before rebounding 40 per cent. It was fear on a grand scale.
During this mayhem,
we predicted in our column 'The paradox of thrift, and other thoughts' (BT,
Feb 7, 2009) that things would soon sort themselves out.
Looking at
big-picture data, we predicted that equities and hard assets such as
precious metals and property would do well. So far, so good with our
predictions.
Looking at forward
indicators, most developed economies will be out of recession in the second
half of 2009. This includes even Europe.
However, this
recovery will be different from previous ones. The global economic landscape
has changed markedly. Investors now need to scrutinise Chinese retail
spending and PMI data as closely as they watch figures out of the United
States. Ten years ago, few cared what the Chinese consumer spent.
Amid on-going
fundamental shifts in the global economy, the money management industry is
undergoing significant changes. And one factor behind the changing
complexion of the wealth management business is the exchange-traded fund (ETF).
Essentially, ETFs are open-end index funds that are listed and traded on
exchanges - like stocks.
From the first
humble listing in the US in 1993, ETFs now straddle virtually all asset
classes - long and short - and have become a global phenomenon. There are
currently more than 1,600 ETFs worldwide, with almost US$660 billion in
assets. Twenty-five per cent of all trades on the New York Stock Exchange
are driven by ETFs.
ETFs are also the
choice instrument for macro bets by hedge fund managers. For example, when
hedge fund manager John Paulson, the billionaire who made a fortune shorting
the US sub-prime market, wanted to bet on gold recently, he did it through
an ETF.
During the savage
bear market of 2008, ETFs experienced net inflows, while unit trusts
experienced net outflows. Indeed, most traditional unit trust managers see
ETFs as one of the biggest threats to their business. Just as mutual funds
did to bank deposits, ETFs are disintermediating traditional mutual funds as
more investors chose to do away with the cost of active stock-picking work.
Indeed, the ETF business is one of the main reasons Blackrock coughed up
US$13 billion to buy Barclays Global Investors.
And on an infinitely
more humble scale, that is why we soft-launched a new portfolio management
service on June 1 to harness the global ETF revolution.
Utilising more than
1,000 ETFs traded on 22 exchanges around the world through one consolidated
Internet account, we are providing clients with the flexibility to invest
long and short in equities, fixed income, commodities and currencies
globally. The goal is to achieve absolute returns regardless of market
direction.
ETFs allow us to go
long and short efficiently, while automatically achieving diversification
and avoiding single-stock risks. But while avoiding single-stock risks, the
investor can pursue targeted sectors as opportune.
Investment
theory and practice show we can eliminate specific risk of individual
securities by diversifying broadly, thus only having exposure to market risk
- that is, the ups and downs of the market in general. Market risk cannot be
diversified away in a long-only portfolio, unlike one that can go short.
Given the expected
uneven nature of the recovery and eventual policy tightening by central
banks around the world, the flexibility to go short is expected to be very
useful.
The following is an
example of a long-short strategy from the recent past. At the beginning of
2008, the outlook was poor for the US but benign for the rest of the world.
Reflecting this, the US dollar was weak but US exports were growing because
the rest of the world was still prosperous. Overall equity valuations in the
rest of the world were not expensive.
One
would, therefore, expect equities ex-US to outperform US equities, but US
government bonds to do well. A typical strategy congruent with this outlook
would be to invest in a global equity ETF but short (or eliminate) the US
exposure by investing in an inverse US equity ETF.
Exposure to US
government bonds would be through a US Treasury ETF with a maturity of
around five years, which would be relatively stable. Therefore, the strategy
would have been translated into three ETFs:
·
iShares S&P Global 100 Index (IOO) - 45 per cent of portfolio.
·
Short S&P500 ProShares (SH) - 25 per cent of portfolio.
·
iShares Barclays 3-7 Year Treasury Bond (IEI) - 30 per cent of portfolio.
Such a construction
would position the portfolio for upside but provide protection on the
downside. Despite the most horrendous year for global equities since the
1930s, this simple three-ETF portfolio would have lost only 1.8 per cent at
the end of 2008.
Our new portfolio
management service built around ETFs gives individuals the flexibility to
invest like a hedge fund but at low cost and with real-time transparency.
It gives investors
the scope of large institutions - without the need for massive portfolios
and outlays. The advent of the Internet technology and the richness of ETF
choices have made this possible. Investors and advisers tend to look at
events through the lens of their mandate and available instrument choices.
Hence, long-only mandates result in a bias to interpret events on the
upside, unlike a strategy that can go both long and short - one that is
indifferent to market direction.
Psychologically,
this has important consequences for portfolio performance. The changing
world suddenly looks less frightening when one can make money whether
markets are up or down.
The writer is CEO of financial adviser New
Independent. He welcomes feedback at : josephchong@ni.com.sg
This article is for information only.
Readers should seek independent advice before making any investment decisions
|