Going by the excellent returns delivered on Singapore's foreign
reserves, Singaporeans should all be looking forward to 'retirement'
By JOSEPH CHONG
CAN we
all retire by 2015? The recent disclosure of GIC's investment
performance in managing Singapore's foreign reserves made headlines
in the local media. It was reported that since inception in 1981,
the portfolio has delivered annualised returns of 9.5 per cent on a
US dollar basis or 8.2 per cent expressed in the local currency.
It was
stated that this was better than benchmarks set, though what these
benchmarks are was not disclosed. And that got me thinking.
The
Lehman's Aggregate Bond Index - a fixed-income benchmark often used
by fund managers - only goes back to 1990. We therefore used the
Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund - which is supposed to mimic
the Lehman's Aggregate Bond Index - as a proxy.
This
index fund delivered an annualised return of 6.9 per cent in US
dollar terms since inception in December 1986. Meanwhile, the MSCI
World Index has delivered an annualised return of 8.9 per cent since
May 1981 and 6.9 per cent since December 1986 in US dollar terms.
An
indexed balanced portfolio of 55 per cent global equities and 45 per
cent global bonds would therefore have returned circa 6.9 per cent
annually since 1986 or about 8 per cent if one assumes that
fixed-income returns are extrapolated back to 1981.
Assuming
the reported GIC returns are net - after management costs - we have
therefore done very well indeed.
The other
point that intrigued us is the market value of Singapore's reserves
- which unfortunately was not disclosed. According to the Monetary
Authority of Singapore's Website, at June 2006 this was about $201
billion, stated at book value but translated at the prevailing
exchange rates.
However,
based on the disclosed returns and the reported initial investment
sum of $10 billion, and assuming that $201 billion is indeed the
current market value, things did not add up when I ran the numbers.
This is
because the calculations showed that additions to the reserves would
have amounted to an average of only $1.7 billion per annum from
1982. From the data illustrated by the accompanying chart, our
current account balance and our increase in foreign reserves was
many times this - on average $14.8 billion and $7.54 billion a year
respectively from 1982. Indeed, $201 billion would be approximately
the uncompounded sum of the annual additions to the official foreign
reserves. Compounding at 8.2 per cent the annual additions to the
official foreign reserves, we arrived at a market value of $468
billion.
Singapore
appears to be a very good example of the eighth wonder of the world
(the heart of all wealth management) - compounding of returns.
These are
fascinating large sums, especially given the rate at which they
appear to be compounding. Indeed, they are so large that they are
like the distances between stars - too large for the mind to grasp.
First,
what does $468 billion mean?
• It is
more than $450,000 per household in Singapore.
• It is more than $133,000 per citizen.
Second,
what does 8.2 per cent per annum on $468 billion mean?
• It
translates into returns of more than $38,000 per household per annum
or about 80 per cent of the median household income in Singapore.
• It translates into an annual return of more than $38 billion or
about 19 per cent of GDP.
• It is more than the Progress Package, the state's annual
expenditure on health care, education and defence combined - with
plenty of change left over.
• It is about five times the annual GDP of Cambodia.
On a more
serious note, the implications are profound. The returns on our
reserves now appear to be the single biggest segment of our economy.
It is not
only the wealth generated but the security it provides. As the
returns are many times our annual defence budget, there is no
question that we do not have the financial means to defend
ourselves. History has shown that wars are won not on the
battlefield but by the resources of the national treasury. I
therefore could not agree more that it is critical that we get the
best people in the world to manage our reserves.
If our
foreign reserves continue to grow at this pace, they will exceed
$1,000 billion - about $1 million per household - by 2015. Thus,
from a financial planning perspective, Singaporeans may be able to
'retire' in 2015. And that would be a global first indeed.

The author is CEO of financial adviser New Independent. He welcomes
feedback at
josephchong@ni.com.sg This article is for information only.
Readers should seek independent advice before making any investment
decisions.