The Business Times, Wednesday August, 2005
Money Matters
Facing up to income inequality
Around the world, the
Gini coefficient is rising, and governments should move to halt the
wave or risk instability
By JOSEPH CHONG
THE
government has recently raised concerns about growing income
inequality in Singapore. Lower level civil servants were recently
given a salary boost in order to reduce the disparity between those
at the top and those at the bottom. This has also been a topic of
discussion in the media. Anecdotally, as a financial advisory firm,
we see this among our clients too. Many successful high flyers are
retiring comfortably before 45, while others appear to need to work
way past retirement.
This trend
of increasing income inequity is not confined to Singapore only.
Unfortunately, it is worldwide. We see this from an analysis of
corporate profits as percentage of GDP in the G7 countries. Although
this ratio is related to the business cycle, the peaks appear to be
getting higher with each new round. The accompanying table illustrates
this.
Currently
this ratio is at a record high and still climbing. Unfortunately, the
reverse is happening with income growth. Wage growth in the G7 has
lagged GDP growth over the past few years and the trend does not seem
to be reversing. This is the undesirable effect attributable to
globalisation as firms arbitrage their labour costs with the
integration of
India
and China into the global economy. It would appear that, thus far,
globalisation has benefited shareholders at the expense of labour in
the G7. Should we, however, continue on this path of unrestrained
global economic meritocracy and 'natural selection'?
Measuring inequity
Income
inequity is commonly measured by the Gini co-efficient. The Gini
co-efficient is a measure of inequality or any form of uneven
distribution developed by the Italian mathematician Corrado Gini in
1912. This coefficient is a number between 0 and 1, where 0
corresponds with perfect equality (where everyone has the same income)
and 1 corresponds with perfect inequality (where one person has all
the income, and everyone else has zero income). The accompanying graph
illustrates this concept. The more the curve sags, the higher the
level of inequality.
The Gini
co-efficient is one of the indices used by UN development agencies to
assess the level of human development in countries around the world.
For example, incomes in the US
have become
more unequal since 1970 as the Gini co-efficient has been increasing
(see table).

Compare it
with the table providing Gini co-efficients for a selection of nations
extracted from the UN Human Development Report 2004. Generally, a high
Gini index is associated with economically weak and/or politically
unstable countries. A slide to a higher Gini would therefore be
associated with higher social tension and political instability - a
clear undesirable.
Indeed,
income inequity, historically, has fomented insurrections. The French
Revolution some 200 years ago and the Communist one 100 years back had
their support in hungry bellies and hopelessness.
In
Singapore's case
Nonetheless, what can Singapore do as an open, price-taking economy in
confronting growing income inequity? I believe we need not worry about
the high flyers. With some research and fees, they would know how to
access good independent financial advice. The problem is those who are
structurally unemployed - too old and without the basic education to
be retrained in high-tech manufacturing.
Firstly, we
might want to attract more labour-intensive businesses to come to
Singapore. Indeed, the Integrated Resorts are a step in the right
direction. Secondly, the market value of our reserves is estimated at
$200 billion to $400 billion. Perhaps, a small fraction of this could
be set aside as an endowment for those structurally unemployed. The
money could be managed by highly respected GIC. This endowment would
be for retirement funding and, if they have children, it will provide
for their children's education. Indeed, the policies we adopt must
eventually break the trap of inherited poverty and thus provide hope
for a smaller Gini
The writer
is CEO of financial adviser New Independent. He welcomes feedback at
josephchong@ni.com.sg