Model Portfolios
Portfolio Purpose
At NI we uniquely provide our clients investment
advice from the financial planning viewpoint.
That is, when we design a client investment portfolio,
it addresses the critical question:
"What is the purpose of the portfolio?"
Generally, portfolios can be categorized by purpose
as follows:
- To fund long term goals
- e.g. retirement, education
- Utilize managed funds (unit trusts) primarily
- To enhance returns on liquidity (cash)
- Bonds or quasi bonds (preferably tax-exempt)
- To enhance returns on speculative assets
- Stock picks, direct investments, hedge funds

"NI Model Portfolios are designed to address
the first purpose: "To fund long term goals".
NI Model portfolios are sub-divided by portfolio
risk and size. There are 5 portfolio risk categories.
NI Model Portfolios by risk
Each portfolio risk category would have a different
mix of fixed income and equities. A conservative portfolio would
have far less equities than an aggressive one. An example of our
strategic asset allocation would be:
|
Asset Type
|
Conservative
|
Moderate
Conservative
|
Moderate
|
Moderate
Aggressive
|
Aggressive
|
|
Equities
|
25%
|
40%
|
55%
|
70%
|
85%
|
|
Bonds
|
72%
|
57%
|
42%
|
27%
|
12%
|
|
Cash
|
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
3%
|
NI Model Portfolios by size
Each portfolio risk category size is then sub-divided
into 3 sizes generally. An example of portfolio size categories:
|
|
Small:
|
<$50K
|
-
< 5 funds (G)
|
|
|
Medium:
|
$50K
to $100K
|
-
5 to 10 funds (G,R)
|
|
|
Standard:
|
>$100K
|
-
>10 funds (G,R,S)
|
An example of how equities are allocated
strategically:
|
Portfolio
Size
|
Global
|
Regional
|
Sector
|
|
Standard
|
40%
|
40%
|
20%
|
|
Medium
|
50%
|
50%
|
-
|
|
Small
|
100%
|
-
|
-
|
There are essentially 3 ways for an
equities portfolio to be diversified:
By allocating to global stock-selection funds
By allocating to regional funds i.e. US, Europe,
Japan, Asia-Pacific
By allocating to global sector funds
Indeed this is how many large pension funds manage their equities
on a global basis.
For standard size portfolios, we are
able to diversify across all 3 ways. However, if the portfolio is
too small, this might not make economic sense. However, we offset
the lack of diversification with a more defensive portfolio. Thus,
moderating risk without sacrificing returns too much.
Strategic Asset Allocation
The strategic asset allocation (SAA)
of a client's portfolio is the long-term (over-business-cycles)
asset allocation he or she ought to have for a given investment
risk appetite. Periodic rebalancing here would not only ensure that
it is consistent with the clients' needs, but ensures that significant
out performance in a particular asset class is locked-in as realized
profits.
Tactical Asset Allocation
The tactical asset allocation (TAA)
is the on-going variation which NI recommends to the client as the
investment and business climate changes, periodically as well as
a-periodically. During different phases of the global business cycle,
different types of assets (bonds, equities, cash etc.) would tend
to outperform relative to each other. TAA is therefore intended
to squeeze more performance out of a portfolio, over and above the
gains derived from periodic SAA rebalancing.
TAA is derived by insights driven
by global economic developments and trends - both short and long-term
e.g. inflation, deflation, GDP and GNP growth, productivity, corporate
profitability, demographics, globalization etc. Our TAA view drives:
Fund Selection
Our fund selection process is driven
by:
- Performance consistency over varying time periods.
- Performance relative to benchmarks and peers.
It would be ideal to have a fund which
is consistently number 1. This, of course, is rarely possible. As
Asset Allocation is a bigger contributor to portfolio performance,
we therefore place more emphasis on performance consistency rather
than outstanding but with a history of high volatility. This unpredictability
would be disruptive and detrimental to the asset allocation process.
Fulcrum
Within the framework of systematic portfolio management, we offer
clients a choice. Clients can have
1.
portfolios benchmarked against specific performance indices
e.g. a global stock index, which is the traditional approach, or
2.
portfolios managed on an absolute return basis, such as
“Fulcrum”
3.
or a combination of both
What is Fulcrum?
Fulcrum is a portfolio advisory and management service with the goal
of achieving absolute returns regardless of market direction, at low
total portfolio management costs. Driven by global macroeconomic
considerations and strategies, Fulcrum portfolios will have the
flexibility of investing long and short in equities, fixed
income, commodities and currencies globally.
This will be done by utilizing primarily exchange traded funds
(ETFs) traded on 22 exchanges around the world, but through one
consolidated internet-based account. The more than 1000 ETFs
available will be the primary instrument of choice. ETFs permit us to
go long and short efficiently whilst automatically achieving
diversification and avoiding single-stock risks. Yet, whilst
permitting the investor to avoid single-stock risks, it allows the
investor to pursue targeted sectors as opportune e.g. US Home
Builders.
Absolute returns regardless of market direction will be achieved by
combining and diversifying among long and short (also called inverse)
ETFs.
Why Fulcrum?
In
the longer-term, Fulcrum combines two important key investing trends
which investors cannot ignore:
1.
ETFs (diversification at the lowest possible costs) and
2.
Alternative investing strategies (flexibility to profit in up
and down markets).
Within the universe of alternative investing strategies, Fulcrum will
focus on historically the most successful of these strategies – global
macro strategies. Herein, New Independent is uniquely positioned to
help clients. Global asset allocation has been the focus of our
investment advice to our clients in the past seven years since the
founding of the firm.
Fulcrum allows the investor the flexibility to invest like a hedge
fund but at low cost and with real-time transparency. Fulcrum allows
the individual investor the investment scope of large institutions
without the need to have very large portfolios and outlays.
Portfolio theory and the practice show that investors can eliminate
specific risk of individual securities by diversifying broadly, thus
only having exposure to market risk – the ups and downs of the market
in general. Market risk, which is the bane of investors seeking
absolute returns, cannot be diversified away. Fulcrum allows the
investor to minimize and even profit from market risk because of the
flexibility to go short.
An
Illustration


At
any one time, Fulcrum will be constructed around a variety of
strategies. These strategies will be derived from the investment
climate and outlook (anticipated changes) around the world. The
following is an example of one such strategy.
At
the beginning of 2008, the outlook was a poor one for the US but a
benign one for the rest of the world. Reflecting this, the US dollar
was weakening but US exports were growing because the rest of the
world was still prosperous. Overall equity valuations in the rest of
the world were not expensive.
One would therefore expect equities ex-USA to outperform US equities
but US government bonds to do well. A typical strategy congruent with
this outlook would be to invest in a global equity ETF but short (or
eliminate) the US exposure by investing in an inverse US equity ETF.
Exposure to US government bonds would be through a US Treasury ETF
with a maturity of around 5 years which would be relatively stable.
Therefore the strategy would have been translated into 3 ETFs:
iShares S&P Global 100 Index (IOO) – 45% of portfolio
Short S&P500 ProShares (SH) – 25% of portfolio
iShares Barclays 3-7 Year Treasury Bond (IEI) – 30% of portfolio
Such a construction would position the portfolio for equity upside but
provide protection on the downside. The accompanying charts show how
things worked out over a 12-month period. Despite the most
horrendous year for global equities since the 1930s, the simple 3-ETF
portfolio would have lost only 1.8% at the end of 2008.